[ Use case 04 ] Bundles · Partly available
"2 for x" or "x/2 each"? Same price, different week.
v0 compares pack framing against a plain unit discount at the same unit price. Cross-product bundles are on the roadmap.
| World | Value | 80% range |
|---|---|---|
| A | 5,779,371 | baseline |
| B (Winner) | 5,966,420 | 5,799,073 – 6,125,827 |
| C | 5,740,689 | 5,607,283 – 5,874,451 |
- A
- Planned: 20% off
- B
- 20% off as a pack, weeks 5-6
- C
- 10% off, weeks 5-6
! Prior-based: the pack effect comes from a published range, not from your history.
[ 01 ] Scope
What's in v0
Whose problem: Sellers choosing how to present a multi-buy offer.
- Pack vs. unit presentation of the same discount, at the same unit price.
The sample shows a 20% promo presented as a pack (world C). It has no unit-framing twin, so it does not show pack beating unit.
[ 02 ] Sample output
The same run, week by week.
Each line is one version of the decision, with its range. The shaded weeks are the campaign window; the weeks after show what it cost or kept.
- A
- Planned: 20% off
- B
- 20% off as a pack, weeks 5-6
- C
- 10% off, weeks 5-6
ABC
[ 03 ] Limits
What it doesn't do yet.
- Bundles of different products are on the roadmap.
- Basket effects are not modelled yet.
- Free-shipping thresholds are not modelled yet.
[ 04 ] Other use cases
- [ Use case 01 ] PromotionsKnow which campaign still pays after it ends.
- [ Use case 02 ] PricingRaise the price. See the volume you'd lose first.
- [ Use case 03 ] Multi-channelA campaign on one marketplace shouldn't blur the other.
- [ Use case 05 ] Launches · RoadmapPick the launch price before the launch.